The Sandown Clown: The 1973 Isle of Wight Encounter That Still Has No Explanation
The Sandown Clown is the name given to a seven-foot, clown-like figure that two children reported meeting near Lake Common on the Isle of Wight in May 1973. Often called Sam the Sandown Clown or All Colours Sam, the being introduced itself by pointing to scrambled words in a notebook, lived in a windowless metal hut, and was never seen again. More than fifty years later, no one has produced a satisfying answer for what the children encountered, and the case is currently drawing fresh attention from major podcasts and magazines.
At Believing the Bizarre, we went back to the original 1978 source report and traced every theory and update that has surfaced since. What we found is one of the strangest and most charming entity reports in British paranormal history.
Quick Answer
The Sandown Clown, also called All Colours Sam, was a seven-foot humanoid figure two children reported meeting near Sandown, Isle of Wight, in May 1973. It wore a green tunic and a pointed yellow hat, communicated through scrambled written words, and lived in a self-built metal hut. The encounter survives through a single 1978 UFO-journal report and remains unexplained, with theories ranging from alien visitor to ghost to childhood imagination.
Key Takeaways: The Sandown Clown
- The Sandown Clown is a one-time entity report from May 1973 near Lake Common, Sandown, on the Isle of Wight.
- The figure stood about seven feet tall, with a neckless head, three-fingered blue gloves, and bare three-toed feet.
- The being introduced itself as “all colours, Sam” by pointing to scrambled words in a notebook.
- The case survives through one source: a 1978 BUFORA journal article titled “Ghost or Spaceman ’73?”
- The girl’s father reported his own anomalous sightings on the Island in 1970 and 1972.
- Two nearby workmen reportedly saw nothing during the encounter.
- The case resurfaced across podcasts, Fortean Times, and a Sandown sculpture between 2024 and 2026.
What Was the Sandown Clown?
The Sandown Clown was a tall, clown-like humanoid reportedly encountered once, by two children, near Sandown on the Isle of Wight in May 1973. The “clown” label came from the children, who had no better word for what they saw. The figure was never a circus performer or a known local character.
The being is also known as Sam the Sandown Clown, All Colours Sam, and the Sandown Ghost Clown. Witnesses described a shy, gentle presence that spoke kindly for about half an hour before disappearing.
What makes the case unusual is its tone. Most entity reports lean toward fear or menace. This one reads as awkward, almost endearing, closer to a misfiring stage act than a threat. That oddness is part of why researchers, podcasters, and folklorists keep returning to it.
The 1973 Sandown Clown Encounter at Lake Common
The Sandown Clown encounter took place near Lake Common on a Tuesday afternoon in May 1973, when two children followed a wailing sound to a footbridge. The girl was later given the pseudonym “Fay” to protect her identity, and the boy was never named in the original report.
The pair, both around seven years old, were playing in the marshy ground between the Shanklin and Sandown golf links and the Island’s small airfield. The sound they heard was a rhythmic wailing, something like an ambulance siren, unlike anything they recognized.
They crossed a golf course and approached a footbridge over a brook. As they got close, the wailing stopped. Then a hand in a blue glove slapped down on the planks, and a tall figure hauled itself up from under the bridge, fumbling with a book and dropping it in the water. It splashed after the book, then hopped, with an odd high-stepping gait, into a windowless metal hut.
What Did the Sandown Clown Look Like?
The Sandown Clown stood close to seven feet tall, with a round head set directly on the shoulders, a pointed yellow hat, a green tunic with a red collar, white trousers, and blue gloves. The single eyewitness account is the source for every physical detail recorded since.
The face was the strangest part. It had triangular markings for eyes, a brown square for a nose, and motionless yellow lips that barely moved when it spoke. The cheeks and forehead were described as paper-white, with a fringe of reddish hair and sparse brown hair beneath the hat. Researchers have never settled whether these were real features or a mask.
Other details push the description further from human. The hands had three fingers, and the feet were bare with three toes. The arms and legs looked like wooden slats, with slat-like antennae reportedly extending from the wrists and ankles, and two more from the sides of the head. The pointed hat carried a black knob on top and seemed to lock into the collar like a hood rather than sit loose like a cap. Taken together, the picture is part clown, part puppet, part machine.
“I Am All Colours, Sam”
The Sandown Clown introduced itself by writing words in a notebook out of order, then pointing to them one by one so the girl could read the sentence: “Hello, and I am all colours, Sam.” This naming moment is where “All Colours Sam” comes from.
At first, the wailing returned, louder, when the figure spoke into a microphone with a white flex. The sound frightened the boy. But the noise stopped again, and the children heard a friendly voice ask whether they were still there. As they crept closer, they realized it could speak without the microphone, too, though its lips stayed still and its words came out unclear.
The conversation that followed is the heart of the legend. When the children asked whether it was a man, it laughed and said no. When they asked whether it was a ghost, it answered, “Well, not really, but I am in an odd sort of way.” Pressed on what it actually was, it would only smile and say, “You know.” It also told them there were others like it, that it was afraid of people, and that it kept another camp somewhere on the mainland.
Inside the Windowless Metal Hut
Sam invited the children into a self-built metal hut with two floors, patterned blue and green walls, an electric heater, and wooden furniture, where the most bizarre moment of the encounter took place. The children entered through a flap in the side.
The interior reads less like a shed and more like a set. The walls were covered in a print that some accounts describe as a pattern of dials. The space felt cobbled together yet deliberate, the kind of detail a child would struggle to invent on the spot.
Then came the berries. Sam said it ate berries and drank river water it could somehow clean. To eat one, it placed the berry in its ear, jerked its neckless head sharply so the berry appeared in an eye socket, then jerked again so the berry moved to the mouth and vanished into a hole. The original report wondered whether this was some kind of feeding mechanism behind a mask. Whatever it was, it suggested a body that did not work like a body.
BTB Research Note: The entire case rests on a single document. Norman Oliver, editor of the BUFORA journal, published the account in the January/February 1978 issue under the headline “Ghost or Spaceman ’73?” There are no photographs, no second witness statement on record, and no physical trace. Every wiki entry, podcast, and video you find today traces back to those few pages.
How the Sandown Clown Story Reached BUFORA
The Sandown Clown account became public because the girl’s father reported it to UFO researchers, who passed it to the British UFO Research Association. Roughly three weeks after the encounter, around early June 1973, the girl told her father what had happened.
The father, identified only as “Mr. Y,” took it seriously rather than dismissing it as make-believe. He shared the story with Leonard G. Cramp, a UFO researcher based on the Isle of Wight, who relayed the details to BUFORA. The case then sat largely unknown until the 1978 journal write-up brought it to a wider audience.
Because the report appeared in a UFO publication, Sam was filed early on as a possible extraterrestrial. That framing stuck. Yet the account itself never claims the figure was an alien. It simply records what two children said they saw, which is part of why the case resists a clean label.
Mr. Y’s Own Strange Sightings
The girl’s father reported two of his own anomalous experiences on the Isle of Wight before his daughter’s encounter, which is why he believed her. These earlier sightings shaped how the whole case was interpreted.
In October 1970, he described red lights in the night sky along the road between Shanklin and Ryde that seemed to keep pace with his car. In March 1972, while on a cliff at Compton Bay, he reported two yellow points of light rising from beneath the sea, which he compared to eyes peering up at him.
Whether those reports strengthen the case or weaken it depends on how you read them. A skeptic sees a father primed to find wonder in an ordinary childhood tale. A believer sees a family that drew unusual attention for reasons no one understands. The original report leaves the connection open, and so do we.
The “Bubble of Reality” and the Oz Factor
The Sandown Clown case includes a hallmark of high-strangeness reports: nearby people who noticed nothing at all. Two workmen repairing a post were reportedly close by, yet a seven-foot figure in plain view did not register with them.
The girl’s father seized on this. He suggested his daughter had somehow been drawn into a separate bubble of reality created by the figure, a private pocket that the workmen could not perceive. When he later returned to the spot, he reportedly found no hut at all.
This lines up with a pattern documented across many anomalous encounters. Researcher Jenny Randles coined the term “Oz Factor” in 1987 to describe the eerie sense witnesses often report of sound dropping away, the air feeling different, and the world going still. The writer Jacques Vallée described something similar as a kind of reality transformation. The episode reads like a textbook example: a thirty-minute meeting that left no trace and that no one else seemed able to see.
What Was the Sandown Clown? The Leading Theories
Theories about the Sandown Clown range from extraterrestrial visitor and ghost to elaborate hoax and pure childhood imagination, with no single explanation covering every odd detail. Researchers have proposed at least half a dozen readings over the decades.
The most discussed possibilities include:
- An alien or ultraterrestrial: The default reading, given the UFO-journal origin and the father’s own sightings. Writers like John Keel and Jacques Vallée argued for entities that seem to exist just outside ordinary reality.
- A ghost or spirit: Supported by the figure’s own cryptic answer that it was a ghost “in an odd sort of way,” and by the workmen who saw nothing.
- A shared imagining: Skeptics suggest a folie à deux, a story two children built together, and a willing father helped expand.
- A human in costume: A local eccentric, or a person in unusual attire that two young children had no frame of reference for.
- An injury or illness survivor: A grounded theory suggests a person with severe burns or injuries, with the microphone serving as an electrolarynx that produced both the speech and the siren, and the costume hiding scarring. It is humane and tidy, though it rests on limited sourcing rather than wide agreement.
- A hoax: The original report itself doubted this, asking why anyone would go to such elaborate trouble for two random kids.
Each theory explains part of the account and stumbles on the rest. That stalemate is the case in a nutshell.

The Strangest Theories of All
The strangest Sandown Clown theories connect the figure to a 1973 film shoot, a famous BBC test card, and a possible mishearing by a child. These ideas are speculative, but they show how hard people have worked to crack the case.
One playful theory points out that the film “That’ll Be the Day,” starring David Essex and Ringo Starr, was shot in the area around the same time. Could a costumed prank by bored cast or crew explain the figure? There is no evidence for it, but the timing keeps the idea alive.
Another links the appearance to BBC Test Card F, which featured a clown beside a young girl and ran constantly on British television then. A tired child in that liminal late-night state might have absorbed the image. A third notes that “all colours Sam” sounds a little like a child saying “Alakazam.” None of these is provable. All of them are the kind of detail that makes this case so fun to chew over.
What the Skeptics Say
Skeptics argue that the simplest explanation fits best: two young children invented a vivid story, and a father who already believed in UFOs encouraged and preserved it. The account reached print five years after the fact, third-hand, with no way to verify tone, sequence, or wording.
That position has real force. Childhood imagination is powerful, memory is unreliable across years, and a credulous adult can sharpen a fuzzy story into a detailed one. There are no photos and no physical evidence to test.
Where the skeptical reading strains is in the specifics. The berry trick, the non-sequential writing, the three-fingered gloves, and the workmen who saw nothing are unusually concrete and consistent for an invention by a seven-year-old. Skeptics handle the broad shape of the case well. They handle its odd, granular details less cleanly.
Which Sandown Clown Theories Hold Up Best?
The most defensible explanations for the Sandown Clown are the grounded ones, a costumed person or a shared childhood story, while a deliberate hoax is the weakest. This is our read, not a settled answer.
A planned hoax makes little sense. No one ever came forward, nothing was gained, and the original report rightly asked why anyone would stage something so elaborate for two random children. The costume and shared imagination theories hold up better because they need no special pleading, though neither fully explains the berry trick or the workmen who noticed nothing.
The alien and ghost readings are the most fun and the least testable, resting entirely on the father’s framing and a single childhood memory. Ranked by everyday plausibility, the human explanations lead. Ranked by how much they actually account for, every option still leaves a gap. That gap is the whole case.
Why the Sandown Clown Is Back in 2026
The Sandown Clown is having a major revival in 2026, with two podcasts tracking down the original witness and renewed coverage in the paranormal press. Interest in the case is higher now than at any point since 1978.
The biggest development is that “Fay” has reportedly been found. The Cease to Exist podcast released a feature-length episode in March 2026, saying it had located her, and BBC Sounds followed with an episode of Uncanny, hosted by Danny Robins alongside parapsychologist and writer Evelyn Hollow and the show’s resident skeptic, parapsychologist Dr Ciaran O’Keeffe, that also tracked her down. By the accounts so far, even Fay cannot say for certain what she met that day.
The case also reached Fortean Times, the long-running British journal of strange phenomena, which featured it in issue 463. The groundwork was laid earlier on the Island itself. Back in 2024, Goldsmiths design lecturer David Jones and artist Natalia Dovhalionok of the Xanadu Collective built an eight-foot sculpture of Sam from the 1978 description and gifted it to the Isle of Wight. In 2025, a year-long arts project at the Boojum and Snark venue in Sandown produced an installation called Windowless Hut. A figure spotted by two children on one afternoon has, fifty years on, become a town’s strange mascot.
BTB Research Note: This case sits in interesting company. Its talking, mimic-like quality, and its insistence that “there are others” echo a wider family of voice-using entities reported in folklore and modern accounts. For more on beings that copy human speech, see our deep dive on mimic entities, browse other strange UFO-era encounters, and explore the full cryptid and entity catalog for cases with a similar high-strangeness flavor.
Frequently Asked Questions: The Sandown Clown
Is the Sandown Clown Real?
There is no proof that the Sandown Clown was real, and no physical evidence has ever surfaced. The case rests entirely on one 1978 report based on the account of two children and the testimony of one girl’s father. Believers point to the consistency and oddly specific details of her story. Skeptics point to childhood imagination, a five-year delay before publication, and a father already convinced he had seen UFOs. The honest answer is that the encounter remains unverified and unexplained.
What Did the Sandown Clown Say to the Children?
The Sandown Clown introduced itself as “all colours, Sam” and answered the children’s questions in short, cryptic phrases. Asked if it was a man, it said no. Asked if it was a ghost, it said it was a ghost “in an odd sort of way.” Asked what it actually was, it would only reply, “You know.” It also told the children it was afraid of people and that others like it existed elsewhere.
Was the Sandown Clown Friendly?
Yes, the children described the Sandown Clown as shy but friendly, and they were not frightened during the roughly thirty-minute encounter. The figure spoke kindly, invited them into its hut, and even told them it was afraid of people and would not defend itself if attacked. The only scary moment came from the loud wailing siren, not from the being itself. By every later account, the girl remembered the meeting as gentle rather than threatening.
Is the Sandown Clown a Cryptid?
The Sandown Clown is sometimes classified as a cryptid, but it fits the label awkwardly because it was a one-time, intelligent, talking figure rather than an elusive animal. Cryptid wikis and catalogs list it, yet its behavior places it closer to entity or high-strangeness reports than to creatures like Bigfoot. Researchers have variously framed it as an alien, a ghost, or an unknown entity, which is why it slips between categories so easily.
Where Did the Sandown Clown Encounter Happen?
The encounter took place near Lake Common in Sandown, on the Isle of Wight, in the marshy ground between the local golf links and the Island’s small airfield. The children followed a wailing sound across a golf course to a footbridge over a brook, where the figure first appeared. The site sits close to what is now the Isle of Wight, Sandown Airport. Both Lake Common and the nearby commons have since been partly absorbed into the golf course.
Why Is It Called All Colours Sam?
The name comes from how the figure introduced itself, writing words out of order in a notebook and pointing to them so the girl read, “Hello, and I am all colours, Sam.” Because the figure presented its own name this way, “All Colours Sam” became the title many researchers and Isle of Wight locals use. Some have noted the phrase sounds faintly like a child saying “Alakazam,” though that connection is speculation rather than fact.
Has Anyone Found the Original Witness?
Yes, recent podcast investigations report that they located “Fay,” the girl from the 1973 encounter, more than fifty years later. The Cease to Exist podcast and BBC Sounds’ Uncanny both say they tracked her down in 2026. By the accounts released so far, she still cannot explain what she experienced, which has only deepened interest rather than closing the case.
The Verdict on the Sandown Clown
This is one of those rare cases that gets stranger the longer you look at it, not clearer. Strip away the wilder theories, and you are still left with a tight, specific, internally consistent story told by a child who, by every later account, never stopped believing it happened.
The skeptical case is reasonable. Children imagine things, memory drifts, and a believing parent can polish a story into something more vivid than the original. None of that requires anything supernatural. It is a clean explanation, and it may well be the right one.
But the details keep snagging. The berry that traveled from ear to eye to mouth. The words written out of sequence. The three-fingered glove on the bridge. The workmen who carried on with their post as though nothing was there. These are not the broad strokes of a typical childhood fantasy. They are the kind of granular, specific details that real memories tend to carry, and invented ones often lack.
We are not prepared to call Sam real. We are not prepared to call the whole thing a fiction. What we can say is that one afternoon in 1973, two children walked toward a sound they could not place, and came back with a story that fifty years of researchers, skeptics, podcasters, and artists still cannot put down.
Where you land is up to you. Explore more reports of strange visitors in our cryptid and entity archive, listen to the full breakdown on the Believing the Bizarre podcast, and if you have ever crossed paths with something you could not explain, submit your own encounter here. Some of the most compelling accounts we have come across started exactly the way this one did, with someone who was not looking for anything unusual at all.


